How does stacking triggers work MTG?
If a player controls multiple abilities that trigger at the same time, that players chooses the order that they are put on the stack. If multiple abilities trigger at the same time for different players, then they are put on the stack in Active Player – Non-Active Player (APNP) order.
How do upkeep triggers stack?
When triggers from multiple players would be put on the stack at once, they are placed in Active Player/Non-Active Player (APNAP) order. His Thopter Assembly’s trigger will go on the stack first, followed by all triggers you control in any order you choose. As the NAP, your triggers will resolve first.
Do you get priority during upkeep?
The upkeep step is the second step of the beginning phase. At the beginning of the upkeep step, any abilities that trigger either during the untap step or at the beginning of upkeep go on the stack. Then the active player gains priority the first time during their turn. During this step, all upkeep costs are paid.
Does legendary rule go on stack?
The Legend Rule is a state-based action (SBA), which are checked and performed each time a player receives priority. SBAs do not use the stack and can not be responded to, but enters the battlefield triggers will still be placed on the stack.
When do you put triggered abilities on the stack?
603.3b If multiple abilities have triggered since the last time a player received priority, each player, in APNAP order, puts triggered abilities he or she controls on the stack in any order he or she chooses. (See rule 101.4.)
What happens when there are multiple players in the game?
If multiple players would make choices and/or take actions at the same time, the active player (the player whose turn it is) makes any choices required, then the next player in turn order (usually the player seated to the active player’s left) makes any choices required, followed by the remaining nonactive players in turn order.
Can you have multiple abilities trigger at the same time?
When multiple abilities trigger at the same time (as Path and Triumph did, in this situation) and you control both of them, you can choose to put them on the stack in any order you like.
Which is better a single trigger or multiple triggers?
Which option is better?: A single trigger per operation (insert/update/delete) that handles multiple concerns (logs, enforces implicit referencial integrity, and executes arbitrary business logic). This trigger could be named D_TableName (“D” for delete). Multiple triggers per operation that were segregated by concern. They could be named:
